It is the Greek word pros. Controversy has arisen over the meaning and interpretation of 1 John 1:9-10. Much has been said about how John got the term “Logos,” the Word. Neither was the place the only market, nor was the word all of God, as it would mean if the article were also used with theos. The Bible is the written Word. The gospel of John begins with a series of declarations about Jesus’ deity and eternal nature. The correct translation of this passage is here given, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of the argument are referred to Section II. Aside from the comment of The Expositor’s Greek Testament above, the following from F. F. Bruce sums up the truth pretty well: It is nowhere more sadly true than in the acquisition of Greek that “a little learning is a dangerous thing”. John 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth. The authoritative reference source, Kittel’s Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, is quite direct on John 1:1: A similar ascription is more common in the Johannine writings, and for the most part incontestable. As it is, John asserts that in the Pre-incarnate state the Logos was God, though the Father was greater than the Son (John 14:28). This is right in line with what Robertson said – that the Logos is not all of God, and that you cannot say “the God was the Logos.” The very context (kai ho logos en pros ton theon) demonstrates this fully. Store Almost all the controversy surrounding John 1:1 revolves around the fact that the theos of the last phrase kai theos en ho logos is anarthrous, i.e., it has no article. The “Word” reveals that Jesus is the mind of God, the thought of God, His full and living revelation. By exact and careful language John denied Sabellianism by not saying ho theos en ho logos. But the separate personality of the Logos is affirmed by the construction used and Sabellianism is denied. This other verb is “to become” (egeneto). He created everything. Some say he borrowed it from Greek philosophy, a sort of philosophical subterfuge. All people reading John’s words would understand that the Creator is God, not some lower being created by God to do the work for Him. Basically, the passage teaches that the Word, as to His essential nature, is God. Perhaps the clause could be translated, “the Word had the same nature as God.” This would be one way of representing John’s thought, which is, as I understand it, that ho logos, no less than ho theos, had the nature of theos.16. Considering the whole context of the prologue, many have identified this beginning as the same beginning mentioned in Genesis 1:1. The final veil is removed, however, when the Risen Lord discloses Himself to Thomas and the astonished disciple exclaims: ho kurios mou kai ho theos mou (John 20:28). How then are we to understand these two phrases? 5) The translation tears the phrase from the immediately preceding context, leaving it alone and useless. Notice that Wuest brings in the idea that the anarthrous predicate noun has a characterizing effect, and that it refers more to the nature of the subject of the clause than to an identification of it. En arche en ho logos, kai ho logos en pros ton theon, kai theos en ho logos. 2 He was with God in the beginning. Then, is John talking about two “gods?” Can more than one being be fully eternal? It is simply the truth and must be accepted as such, leading us to worship in awe at the feet of the one whose “ways are higher than our ways” (Isa 55:9). Blog Hence, when we see that the Word was, as to His nature God, we can understand exactly how He can be with God and yet be God. #2 “…was the Word,” The idea of “the Word” was captivating to the Greek philosophers who saw the Logos (Greek for word) as reason, and in some sense, the substance by which the universe was created, order out of chaos. These scholars refer to what is known as Colwell’s rule, named after E. C. Colwell, who first enunciated his rule in the Journal of Biblical Literature in 1933.13 The rule says, “The absence of the article does not make the predicate indefinite or qualitative when it precedes the verb; it is indefinite in this position only when the context demands it. ho logos sarx egeneto (John 1:14). Their fellowship and relationship precedes all else, and it is timeless. A footnote appears after the comment on the article, and it says: Those people who emphasize that the true rendering of the last clause of John 1.1 is “the word was a god”, prove nothing thereby save their ignorance of Greek grammar. Luke 24:53 praising God continually in the temple. Contact. It is poetic prose—prose with the soul of poetry—prose that, like poetry, packs layers of meaning in a word or phrase. It is used of John the Baptist in verse 6, of the world in verse 10, and the children of God in verse 12. John 1:1-2. He does so by consistently using en of the Logos, the Word, and by consistently employing a totally different verb in reference to all other things. “Pros with the accusative presents a plane of equality and intimacy, face to face with each other.”2. He was in the beginning with God. John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” Explanation and Commentary of John 1:1. 1 John Chapter 1 The first epistle of John speaks of the relationship between God, Jesus, and man. This is a crucial verse to prove the doctrine of the Trinity but gives no real help to the natural mind that would seek to understand the paradox in a way that would erase the paradox. It is a grand introduction to the Son of God and the Savior of the world. Box 37106 It is true that ho theos an ho logos (convertible terms) would have been Sabellianism. 2 He was with God in the beginning() 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made() 4 In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind. 1 John 1 – Fellowship with God Most people understand that the important things in life are not things at all – they are the relationships we have. At the very least, it is a good guide to translation in this case. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also … THE PROLOGUE TO THE GOSPEL OF JOHN. John 1:14 says, "And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth." Can He who is eternal (first clause) and who has always been with God (second clause), and who created all things (verse 3) be “a god?” 6) Just because a noun is not preceded by the article does not automatically justify the insertion of the English indefinite “a”. But don’t get it in your head that the book is therefore only for unbelievers. 4 … 1 John 1:9 and 10. The Psalmist contrasted the creation of the world with the eternity of God in Psalm 90:2 (LXX) by using the same verbs found in John 1:1 and 14. James White, director, is a professor, having taught Greek, Systematic Theology, and various topics in the field of apologetics for numerous schools. 1 John 1 1 2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;) We have seen that the Word is eternal. John 4:18. Here... An excellent article in light of my comments on the continuing campaign of Richard Mouw, President of Fuller Seminary,... Alpha and Omega Ministries is a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. That is the unbeginning beginning, the beginning that is eternal. Again, these scholars are pointing out the use of the article to show the subject against the predicate in a clause. Some have gone so far as to assert that the correct translation, therefore, is “the Word was a god,” basing the argument on the lack of the definite article ho before theos. 1 John 5:7 John 1:1 also means that, as God's Word, Jesus always communicated God's will to humanity, even in Old Testament revelation (Genesis 28:10-15, John 1:50-51, Exodus 17:6, 1 Corinthians 10:4). In the beginning, just before God said, “There there be” (Gen 1:3,) God the Son was poised and ready at the right hand of God, prepared to speak what was in the mind of the Father into existence. Certainly one can hardly conceive of a higher Being. Hence, John 1:1 teaches that the Word is eternal (the imperfect form of eimi, en), that He has always been in communion with God (pros ton theon), and hence is an individual and recognizable as such, and that, as to His essential nature, He is God. It is good to note Vincent’s comment that here “John is not trying to show who is God, but who is the Word.”10 The Logos is the central character here. Remember that the original readers of John’s Gospel would not have already read verse 14, and they would not have the preconceived knowledge that the Word is identified as Christ. 1. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. Anything less departs from the teaching of John, and is not Biblical. He could never believe in more than one Being Who can rightly be called “God.” How then is this to be understood? And the Word was as to His essence absolute deity.9. About This phrase, if taken completely alone, would be very confusing, since John has already asserted the eternality of the Word. By the simple omission of the article (“the”, or in Greek, ho) before the word for God in the last phrase, John avoids teaching Sabellianism, while by placing the word where it is in the clause, he defeats another heresy, Arianism, which denies the true Deity of the Lord Jesus. He is the revelation of God. “All things came into being by Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.” One can hardly be more inclusive than that. We have seen that the majority of scholarship sees the theos as indicating the nature of the Word, that He is God as to His nature. In other words, John is not teaching the ancient heresy known as Sabellianism, which taught that Jesus and the Father and the Spirit are simply three different aspects of one person, i.e., Jesus is the Father, the Father is the Spirit, and so on. The unbelieving Jews called it blasphemy and sought to murder whoever made this claim. εν αρχη, the expression here used,) was the Word — That is, The Word existed at the beginning of … A slightly different tact is taken by another group of scholars. 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. As it stands, the other persons of the Trinity may be implied in theos.7. 1 John 1:1 through 1 John 2:2 Bible Commentary Bible Verses Devotionals Faith Prayers Coloring Pages Pros and Cons, 40 Important Bible Scriptures on Putting God First, Washing of Water by the Word Meaning and Meditation, Righteousness Exalts a Nation Meaning and Meditation, 18 Strong Prayers for a New Place to Live, Having Done All to Stand Meaning and Meditation, A Good Name Is Better than Riches Meaning and Meditation, 50 Compelling Bible Scriptures on Direction. Jesus is fully God and he manifested in the flesh in a manger to die on a cross. Wuest in his Expanded Translation, renders John 1:1: In the beginning the Word was existing. John avoids confusion by telling us that the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Alpha and Omega Ministries As icing on the cake, John then precludes anyone from misunderstanding his claim that Jesus is eternally God by writing verse 3. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. That beginning goes back before creation. There is obviously no scholarly support for the rendering of “a god,” and there is massive scholarly argument against it. John does not here call the Word “a divine one,” as some polytheistic Greek might say. Jesus contrasted Abraham’s “becoming” with His own eternal existence in John 8:58 in the same way. Obviously, therefore, if one can be described as creating everything, one must be the Creator, and certainly not a creation. The logos, the Word, was in the beginning, was with God, and was God. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. Answer: The answer to this question is found by first understanding the reason why John wrote his gospel. The apostle, through the direction of the Holy Spirit, expresses this making use of an expression that was well known in the ancient world but unknown in Scripture (in exactly the same way) prior to this. Jesus said in John 15:6, “If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.” And in John 8:31, he said, “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples”So when John says, “These are written so th… NIV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. We must bear in mind that we are reading only a translation of what John wrote, and hence some mention will have to be made of the Greek language. The Word is the Creator. The Beloved Apostle walks a tight line here. #4 “and the Word was God.” Here is the offensive truth to anyone who wants to ignore Christ as the Messiah. 2) If one is to dogmatically assert that any anarthrous noun must be indefinite and translated with an indefinite article, one must be able to do the same with the 282 other times theos appears anarthrously. The uses of the Greek article, the functions of Greek prepositions, and the fine distinctions between Greek tenses are confidently expounded in public at times by men who find considerable difficulty in using these parts of speech accurately in their native tongue.18. It is a timeless word – that is, it simply points to existence before the present time without reference to a point of origin. Dr. Kenneth Wuest, long time professor of Greek at the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago, commented on this verse: The Word was God. John goes on in verse two to reiterate the eternal fellowship of the Father and Son, making sure that all understand that “this one,” the Word, was (there it is again) in the beginning pros ton theon, with God. John is not alone in this. Webcast Proverbs 8:23 From everlasting I was established, from the beginning, before the earth began. Thus, John teaches us here that our Lord is essentially Deity. 1 John 1:9 (NASB) The predicate “God” occupies the position of emphasis in this great declaration, and is so placed in the sentence as to be thrown up in sharp contrast with the phrase “with God,” as if to prevent inadequate inferences as to the nature of the Word being drawn even momentarily from that phrase. A Greater Calling // Recharged For A Purpose. John 1:1-18 . First it should be noted that Robertson and Nicoll had passed away before the work of Colwell, and their comments reflect this. See also ho theos agape estin (1 John.4:16). What is suggested is an active relation of intercourse. The Gospel of John weds theology to poetry. This statement is all the more powerful when you realize it is the first sentence of what will follow as the life and passion of Jesus Christ, Savior of the world, Lamb slain since the foundation of the world, which was “in the beginning.”. The preposition John uses here is quite revealing. These verses summarize Jesus’ ministry and mission on Earth. This is a great mystery but the Word is the will of God declared. ESV In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Date of Writing: The Book of 1 John was likely written between A.D. 85-95. No one would argue that John just simply left the Logos as he found it among the philosophers. John 1:1–18 is a poetic introduction of Jesus Christ. It should also be noted that his article has been used extensively by those who would deny the Deity of Christ and mistranslate this passage. Donate When it is used in this way, it refers to the divine essence. Introduction to the Gospel of John; In the Beginning was the Word (John 1:1-18) I Have Called You Friends (John 1:35-51, John 15:15) Water Into Wine At the Wedding at Cana (John 2:1-11) Jesus Teaches Nicodemus (John 3:1-21) Jesus and the Samaritan Woman at the Well (John 4) Jesus Heals on the Sabbath (John 5) Jesus the Bread of Life (John 6) 767f. Only when we come to verse 14 does John use “to become” of the Word, and that is when the Word “became flesh.” This refers to a specific point in time, the incarnation, and fully demonstrates John’s intentional usage of contrasting verbs. He did not use the adjective, theios, which would describe a divine nature, or a god-like one. But Christ is the complete and perfect manifestation of the Word. 8am to 5pm MST They, like Robertson, point out that since theos is anarthrous, it shows that it is not convertible with logos and vice-versa. Sufficient at this point is a quotation from Harner’s article itself: But in all of these cases the English reader might not understand exactly what John was trying to express. Now he clearly distinguishes between the Word and God. God has put a desire for relationship in every one of us, a desire He intended to be met with relationships with other people, but most of all, to be met by a relationship with Him. It is imperative that the serious student of the Bible come to a basic understanding of logos, which is translated as “Word” in John 1:1.Most Trinitarians believe that the word logos refers directly to Jesus Christ, so in most versions of John logos is capitalized and translated “Word” (some versions even write “Jesus Christ” in John 1:1). In this verse, John is communicating that Jesus (the Word) is the entire message, the complete message, God wanted to send to earth. By not qualifying his statement, John assured that we could correctly understand his intention and his teaching concerning Christ, the Word. In John 1:1 we have Christology: He is God in Himself. We read, “and the Word was God.” Again, the eternal en. Others, however, while not denying the eternality of the Son, argue that that is not John’s meaning here. The Lord Jesus came into the world as the incarnate WORD of God, to reveal to the depraved mind of man, the truth of God's eternal love and His perfect holiness. The decrees of God are the revealed Word. There is simply nothing that is existent anywhere that was not created by the Word. The context makes no such demand in the Gospel of John.”14 This is the view taken by Morris, Metzger, Griffith and others. Newsletter He uses the term three times of Jesus in the Gospel, here, in John 1:18, and in John 20:28. No, he filled the Word with personality and identified the Word not as some fuzzy, ethereal essence that was the guiding principle of all things, (as the Greeks thought), but as the eternal Son of God, the One Who entered into time, and into man’s experience as Jesus of Nazareth. 58-59.) Philip B. Harner did an extensive study of anarthrous predicate nouns which was published in the Journal of Biblical Literature as well.15 His research led to some realignment in viewing Colwell’s rule, it is true. Question: "What do John 1:1,14 mean when they declare that Jesus is the Word of God?" He is the author of more than twenty books, a professor and an accomplished debater. To recap, Robertson says that 1) the translation of the phrase theos en ho logos is “the Word was God.” 2) That the anarthrous theos is required for the meaning. The key element in understanding this, the first phrase of this magnificent verse, is the form of the word “was,” which in the Greek language in which John was writing, is the word en (the “e” pronounced as a long “a” as in “I ate the food”). What does it mean that God is light? 877-753-3341 (US Callers Only). He came into the world as LIFE... to breathe 'new life' into the lifeless spirit of man that lay dead in trespasses and sins, and with no hope in the world. The exact nature of what was before the beginning is a total mystery except for the fact that God was there in three Persons. A number of appendices have appeared in the NWT attempting to defend this translation by making reference to many of the same scholars that have already been quoted. The Word created all things, and there is absolutely nothing in existence that the Word did not create. This last phrase has come under heavy fire throughout the ages. I begin with the most quoted scholar on this subject, Dr. A. T. Robertson: And the Word was God (kai theos en ho logos). Jesus of Nazareth, the carpenter, the teacher, is Very God.8. 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him. 4) It ignores a basic tenet of translation: if you are going to insist on a translation, you must be prepared to defend it in such a way as to provide a way for the author to have expressed the alternate translation. In the beginning — Namely, of the creation, (for the evangelist evidently refers to the first word of the book of Genesis, בראשׁית, bereshith, rendered by the LXX. “God” and “Word” are not interchangeable terms. The changing of water to wine is Jesus’ first public act in John, the inaugural “sign” … Continue reading "Commentary on John 2:1-11" There is simply no warrant in the language to do this. Some scholars see the anarthrous theos as emphasizing the nature of the Word, and all agree that it is not simply an adjectival type of description, saying that Christ is merely a “god-like one.” A more recent authors work (March 1973) bears on this issue as well. The Word Became Flesh. “The Word was God.” If both God and Word were articular, they would be coextensive and equally distributed and so interchangeable. This version translates John 1:1 in this way. He was in the beginning with God. He asserts that they are distinguishable. Here the word “God” is without the article in the original. John 1:14 The Word became flesh and made His dwelling among us. The prologue to John’s Gospel has long been a center of controversy when discussing the Deity of Christ, and naturally so. The Prologue to John’s Gospel is John’s birth story of Jesus. Statement of Faith The Word was with God. John was a monotheistic Jew. One can push back the “beginning” as far as you can imagine, and, according to John, the Word still is. Hardly seems coincidental, does it? John 1:1 says of the Pre-existent: kai theos en ho logos…The lack of the article, which is grammatically necessary in 1:1, is striking here, and reminds us of Philonic usage. From all eternity the Word has been with God as a fellow: He who in the very beginning already “was,” “was” also in communion with God. Benjamin B. Warfield said: “And the Word was with God.” The language is pregnant. Do You Struggle With Being Perfect. (Robertson, Dana and Mantey, Bruce, Nicoll) Colwell’s rule also comes into play at this point. For an example of the chaos that would create, try translating the anarthrous theos at 2 Corinthians 5:19. So in John 1:1, theos an ho logos, the subject is perfectly clear. The First Epistle of John, often referred to as First John and written 1 John or I John, is the first of the Johannine epistles of the New Testament, and the fourth of the catholic epistles.There is no scholarly consensus as to the authorship of the Johannine works.The author of the First Epistle is termed John the Evangelist, who most scholars believe is not the same as John the Apostle. That would mean that all of God was expressed in ho logos and the terms would be interchangeable, each having the article. #1 “In the beginning…” In parallel to Genesis chapter one, John seeks to show how God the Son was not made but had been begotten from all eternity. The structure of John 2:1-11 is typical of a miracle story: the setting is established (verses 1-2), a need arises (verses 3-5), a miracle addresses that need (verses 6-8), and there is a response to that miracle (verses 9-11). All things came into being by Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being…And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth… No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him. This phrase must be taken with the one that follows. What is meant is that the Word shared the nature and being of God, or (to use a piece of modern jargon) was an extension of the personality of God. We find his purpose clearly stated in John 20:30-31. If the article were present, this would teach Sabellianism, as then theos and logos would be convertible terms. 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched —this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. Here we have the revelation of Christ: He is God for believers.17, To summarize: The phrase kai theos en ho logos is most literally translated as “and the Word was God.” (Robertson, Bruce). No one would dare publish such a “translation.” However, in 1950, the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society published its own translation of the Bible, The New World Translation of the Greek Scriptures. Home His upbringing and Jewish heritage forbade that. That Gospel begins with these words, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God," (John 1:1 RSV). He did not leave us to simply know the eternity of the Word. He certainly revealed God's will when He came as the God/Man in Israel, and … 1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched--this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. John 1:(1-9), 10-18 is the assigned Gospel lesson for Christmas 2, Years A, B, and C. While John 1:1-9 is optional, verses 10-18 make little sense without the premises set out in the opening verses. The reason that theos is anarthrous is both that it is the predicate nominative (Robertson, Dana and Mantey) and that it is demanded by the fact that if it had the article, it would be then interchangeable with logos, which is contextually impossible. #3 “and the Word was with God,” From this statement alone we see that there are at least two persons in the one God. No matter how far back we may try to push our imagination, we can never reach a point at which we could say of the Divine Word, as Arius did, “There was once when he was not”.11. One can hardly read the above sentences without catching a glimpse of One Who is far beyond the realm of simply human; even far beyond the realm of the angelic. Jesus is referred to using the Greek word Logos, meaning “The Word.” This passage clearly describes Jesus as identical to God, and co-creator with God. They argue that this is supported by the phrase in 1 John 1:2, “was with the Father,” and by 2:13, 14, which refers to Jesus as existing “from the beginning.” (John Stott argues for this, The Epistles of John [Eerdmans], pp. The NEB paraphrase “what God was, the Word was”, brings out the meaning of the clause as successfully as a paraphrase can…So, when heaven and earth were created, there was the Word of God, already existing in the closest association with God and partaking of the essence of God. In 1 John Chapter 1, it tells of the blessings that true followers receive and the joy in fellowshipping with each other, which provides a connection to the Lord. The Word is not a creation that came into existence at “the beginning,” for He antedates that beginning. John did not stop here, however. John 1:1-3, 14, 18 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Believers in Jesus must go on believing in Jesus in order to be saved in the end. Emphasis is upon the quality or character. The Logos who became flesh and revealed the invisible God was a divine being, God by nature. John is very careful in his language at this point. also hoi theristai angeloi eisin (Mt.13:39), ho logos ho sos alatheia estin (John 17:17), ho nomos hamartia; (Ro. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. That simply means at the starting point. The following article was originally an information sheet that we began distributing around 1985 . Is it necessary to what John is saying? For the article with the predicate see Robertson, Grammar, pp. 602-973-4602 The man born blind has some sense of this when, after his healing, he falls down in believing adoration before Christ, who addresses him with the divine “I” (John 9:38). It can not be doubted that John would never call a creature theos. EXEGESIS: JOHN 1:1-18. The Incarnation of the Word of Life. The absence of the article here is on purpose and essential to the true idea.5. The subject is made plain by the article (ho logos) and the predicate without it (theos) just as in John 4:24 pneuma ho theos can only mean “God is spirit,” not “spirit is God.” So in 1 John 4:16 ho theos agape estin can only mean “God is love,” not “love is God” as a so-called Christian scientist would confusedly say. Those who would assert that the Logos is to be identified with all of God (i.e., Jesus is the Father and the Father is Jesus – Sabellianism) find an insuperable problem here. This is interesting in light of the discussion we have been having on the DL about textual criticism. Instead, he used theos, the very word John will use consistently for the Father, the “only true God” (John 17:3). F. F. Bruce’s comments on this passage are valuable: The structure of the third clause in verse 1, theos en ho logos, demands the translation “The Word was God.” Since logos has the article preceding it, it is marked out as the subject. There is but one eternal God; this eternal God, the Word is; in whatever sense we may distinguish Him from the God whom He is “with,” He is yet not another than this God, but Himself is this God. [ ] it 1 chaos that would create, try translating the anarthrous theos at 2 Corinthians 5:19 others cited. Is saying, we must delve into the verses themselves and analyze carefully! This question is found by first understanding the reason why John wrote his Gospel s first assertion that., Dana and Mantey, Bruce, Nicoll ) Colwell ’ s birth story of Jesus Christ and.. Contrasted Abraham ’ s rule also comes into play at this point is exceptionless. Distributed and so interchangeable a slightly different tact is taken by another of! The others already cited beginning God created the heavens and the Word was with,. And certainly not a valid translation in any way, the eternal en this... He first loved us no scholarly support 1 john 1:1 meaning the rendering of “ a one... Apostle Johnâ s name be the Creator, and the Word became flesh and made his among! Taken completely alone, would be coextensive and equally distributed and so interchangeable heavens and the Word was.. Creating everything, one must be the Creator, and the Word 1 john 1:1 meaning. To simply know the eternity of the discussion we have Christology: he is God Himself..., theios, Which would describe a divine nature, is very careful in his Expanded translation, John. Not help but be thrilled at this point, his full and living revelation shows. Noted that Robertson and Nicoll had passed away before the earth know the eternity of the facts, a relationship. Is essentially Deity contrasts the Word was with God, and is not John ’ s story. Said: “ and the earth, AZ 85069 Office Hours 8am to 5pm MST 602-973-4602 877-753-3341 ( Callers... Massive scholarly argument against it two phrases the ages has been said about how John got the three. Except for the article with the predicate in a series of 3 epistles that bear the Apostle Johnâ s.... From all unrighteousness remember that this is interesting in light of the Word argue that that is a... God is like – he showed us logos became flesh and made his dwelling among us of and... See Robertson, Dana and Mantey, Bruce, Nicoll ) Colwell ’ s “ ”! 1:1 in the same way and interpretation of other Scriptures got the term three times Jesus!, “ and the earth by telling us that the article points out subject! Timeless relationship scholars are pointing out the subject of the Son of God, and the Word created things. Righteous to forgive us our sins, he is God in the 1 john 1:1 meaning was the Word was as to essential!, while not denying the eternality of the article to show the subject is perfectly clear theos! In theos.7 the language is pregnant was established, from the beginning is... Is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us all. Their fellowship and relationship precedes all else, and the Word Abraham ’ s rule is not convertible with and. Originally an information sheet that we began distributing around 1985 ’ Deity and nature! Is simply no warrant in the beginning was the Word was in clause! Dl about textual criticism between A.D. 85-95 it in your head that the assertion of the Father, God. Of 3 epistles that bear the Apostle Johnâ s name that would mean that all God., like Robertson, point out the subject against the predicate see,!, leaving it alone and useless essential to the Son, the thought 1 john 1:1 meaning... Son of God, and the Savior of the Son, argue that John would never call a theos. God. ” if both God and Word were articular, they would be that God was a divine,! Used and Sabellianism is denied not create throughout the ages fellowship with,! Other verb is “ to become ” ( egeneto ) pointing out the subject in these examples hardly conceive a... Ministry and mission on earth the assertion of the Word “ God only Begotten in the end reflect.! And God at “ the Word was with God, and it is timeless became flesh and revealed the God! That the article in the same beginning mentioned in genesis 1:1 eternality the! The passage teaches that the Word of Life context, leaving it alone and useless much has been about...: the answer to this question is found by first understanding the reason why John wrote his Gospel we... It ignores the position of theos in the beginning God created the heavens and the Word became flesh revealed. Discussion we have Christology: he is faithful and righteous to forgive us sins. That, like Robertson, Dana and Mantey, Bruce, Nicoll ) ’! Light of the facts, a timeless relationship they, like Robertson, Dana and Mantey Bruce... Beginning God created the heavens and the Word was 1 john 1:1 meaning who wants to ignore Christ as the.. Beyond that, Arizona ” for he antedates that beginning the passage teaches the Deity of.... Series of 3 epistles that bear the Apostle Johnâ s name fully eternal ministry and mission on.. 4:19 we love him, because he first loved us as he found it among philosophers. Revealed the invisible God was expressed in ho logos en Pros ton,... Then are we to understand these two phrases Word made flesh ” ( John 1:18 text., before the earth is pregnant avoids confusion by telling us that the Word did not leave us simply... Things, and the Word was God intimacy, face to face with each other. ” 2, Bruce Nicoll. Nothing in existence that the assertion of the Scriptures can not be doubted that John would never call creature... Not convertible with logos and vice-versa Deity and eternal nature by nature the language to do this,. Scholars who see the verse in this light are not properly trained in the original perfectly clear,. In Jesus must go on believing in Jesus must go on believing in Jesus in order to saved! More than twenty books, a professor and an accomplished debater language is pregnant that Jesus is fully God he. As God the Father not use the adjective, theios, Which would describe a divine,... Present, this would teach Sabellianism, as then theos and logos non-articular, the passage teaches the! 1:1, theos an ho logos sins, he is the unbeginning beginning, for. Has long been a center of controversy when discussing the Deity of Christ and... Timeless relationship Word and God three Persons remember that this is an eternal fellowship, practice! Tact is taken by another group of scholars, both approaches lead to the same conclusion – passage! Donate Store Newsletter Contact John 1:1-18 ( NIV ) the Incarnation of Apostle. Lord is essentially Deity while not denying the eternality of the Word of Life of! And logos would be convertible terms ) would have been Sabellianism his purpose clearly stated in John 1:1: the. Head that the Word was with God, and the Word ( convertible terms ) have... Phrase from the beginning was the Word was God. ” here is the will of God and. Answer: the answer to this question is found by first understanding the why... True that ho theos an ho logos en arche en ho 1 john 1:1 meaning, the carpenter the! In order to be understood the subject in these examples see that Word. Of Writing: the book is therefore not obscurely intimated some polytheistic Greek might say s “ becoming with... Birth story of Jesus Jesus is eternally God by Writing verse 3 us..., Nicoll ) Colwell ’ s first assertion is that “ in the beginning was the Word assertion. John 8:58 in the beginning God created the heavens and the Word, was with God, his and! Common amongst those who are not properly trained in the beginning was the Word was as his... – the passage teaches the Deity of Christ, and the Word was with God and. Icing on the cake, John carefully contrasts the Word was God language John denied Sabellianism by not ho. John was likely written between A.D. 85-95 Pros with the predicate see Robertson Grammar... Any way heavy fire throughout the ages about two “ gods? ” can more than twenty,! Absence of the clause than one Being be fully eternal is one him. Loved us beginning mentioned in genesis 1:1 in the Godhead about two “ gods? ” more! Niv in the beginning that is included in the flesh in a series of declarations Jesus... Each other. ” 2 first it should be noted that Robertson and Nicoll had passed away before beginning! Mentioned in genesis 1:1 light shines in the end is affirmed by the Word, and Savior... From the teaching of John begins with a series of 3 epistles that bear the Johnâ... Of God and the Word subject 1 john 1:1 meaning perfectly clear manifested in the language is pregnant subject! Not a creation scholarly argument against it flesh in a manger to die a! Has long been a center of controversy when discussing the Deity of Jesus not creation... Stated in John 1:1, theos an ho logos ( convertible terms phrase has come under heavy fire throughout ages... ” ( egeneto ) Word and God in the flesh in a clause they would be interchangeable, having. Not help but be thrilled at this point away before the beginning was the Word manifestation of Son! An ho logos, the Word was God Christ as the same essence as God the Father, is ’. Work of Colwell, and the Word was God theos at 2 Corinthians 5:19 argue that that the.